![]() ![]() ![]() Participants have to complete a series of drawings by identifying relevant features based on the spatial organization of an array of objects and choosing one object that matches one or more of the identified features. The Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) is one of the most commonly used measures of fluid ability. Various measures have been thought to assess fluid intelligence. Like fluid ability's relation to crystallized intelligence, Piaget's operativity is considered to be prior to, and ultimately provides the foundation for, everyday learning. ![]() ![]() Crystallized ability and Piaget's treatment of everyday learning reflects the impress of experience. Fluid ability and Piaget's operative intelligence both concern logical thinking and the "eduction of relations" (an expression Cattell used to refer to the inferring of relationships). Researchers have linked the theory of fluid and crystallized abilities to Piaget's theory of cognitive development. Relationship to Piaget's theory of cognitive development In his made-up example, Horn described a boy who is too young to attend secondary school but could solve the problem through the application of fluid ability: "He may reason that if half the two-legged people are without shoes, and all the rest (an even number) are one-legged, then the shoes must average one per person, and the answer is 100." In contrast to the crystallized approach to solving the problem, Horn provided a made-up example of a fluid approach to solving the problem, an approach that does not depend on the learning of high school-level algebra. X + 1 / 2 ∗ ( 100 − x ) ∗ 2 equals the number of two-legged patients. The crystallized approach to solving the problem would involve the application of high school-level algebra. One-half of the remainder are barefooted. Some (an even number) are one-legged but wearing shoes. Horn provided the following example of crystallized and fluid approaches to solving a problem. Example application of fluid and crystallized abilities to problem-solving Examples of tasks that measure crystallized intelligence are vocabulary, general information, abstract word analogies, and the mechanics of language. Horn notes that crystallized ability is a "precipitate out of experience," resulting from the prior application of fluid ability that has been combined with the intelligence of culture. It reflects the effects of experience and acculturation. Ĭrystallized intelligence ( g c) refers to learned procedures and knowledge. Examples of tasks that measure fluid intelligence include figure classifications, figural analyses, number and letter series, matrices, and paired associates. Tasks measuring fluid reasoning require the ability to solve abstract reasoning problems. Horn notes that it is formless and can "flow into" a wide variety of cognitive activities. Fluid versus crystallized intelligence įluid intelligence ( g f) refers to basic processes of reasoning and other mental activities that depend only minimally on prior learning (such as formal and informal education) and acculturation. The concepts of fluid and crystallized intelligence were further developed by Cattell and his former student John L. History įluid and crystallized intelligence are constructs originally conceptualized by Raymond Cattell. Crystallized intelligence, on the other hand, involves the ability to deduce secondary relational abstractions by applying previously learned primary relational abstractions. Fluid intelligence is the ability to solve novel reasoning problems and is correlated with a number of important skills such as comprehension, problem-solving, and learning. According to Cattell's psychometrically-based theory, general intelligence ( g) is subdivided into g f and g c. The concepts of fluid intelligence ( g f) and crystallized intelligence ( g c) were introduced in 1963 by the psychologist Raymond Cattell. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |